Related articles by
Review Article
Other versions:
- Article InfoArticle Info
- CiteCite
- MetricsMetrics
- CommentComment
- RelatedRelated
- CitedCited
Bioenergy and climate change mitigation: an assessment. GCB Bioenergy 7: 916.
DOI: 10.1111/gcbb.12205
Exploring the potential of grass feedstock from marginal land in Ireland: Does marginal mean lower yield?. Biomass and Bioenergy 107: 361.
DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2017.10.014
Constraints on the availability of marginal land for bioenergy production in southern Sweden. Biomass and Bioenergy 190: 107421.
DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2024.107421
Widespread production of bioenergy: land and water availability factors. Biofuels 8: 623.
DOI: 10.1080/17597269.2016.1242693
Biogas production from coumarin-rich plants—inhibition by coumarin and recovery by adaptation of the bacterial community. FEMS Microbiology Ecology 91: fiv103.
DOI: 10.1093/femsec/fiv103
A novel composite environmental fragility index to analyse Italian ecoregions’ vulnerability. Land Use Policy 122: 106352.
DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106352
Conclusive Results of the European Project OPTIMA: Optimization of Perennial Grasses for Biomass Production in the Mediterranean Area. BioEnergy Research 8: 1459.
DOI: 10.1007/s12155-015-9679-x
Drought‐tolerant succulent plants as an alternative crop under future global warming scenarios in sub‐Saharan Africa. GCB Bioenergy 15: 1287.
DOI: 10.1111/gcbb.13095
Associative nitrogen fixation linked with three perennial bioenergy grasses in field and greenhouse experiments. GCB Bioenergy 12: 1104.
DOI: 10.1111/gcbb.12744
Advanced biofuels to decarbonise European transport by 2030: Markets, challenges, and policies that impact their successful market uptake. Energy Strategy Reviews 34: 100633.
DOI: 10.1016/j.esr.2021.100633
Marginal Agricultural Land Low-Input Systems for Biomass Production. Energies 12: 3123.
DOI: 10.3390/en12163123
Biodiversity impacts of bioenergy crop production: a state‐of‐the‐art review. GCB Bioenergy 6: 183.
DOI: 10.1111/gcbb.12067
Environmental consequences of the conversion from traditional to energy cropping systems in a Mediterranean area. European Journal of Agronomy 70: 124.
DOI: 10.1016/j.eja.2015.07.008
Concepts of agricultural marginal lands and their utilisation: A review. Agricultural Systems 204: 103560.
DOI: 10.1016/j.agsy.2022.103560
Valuation of ecosystem services of commercial shrub willow (Salix spp.) woody biomass crops. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 189: .
DOI: 10.1007/s10661-017-5841-6
Wild Miscanthus Germplasm in a Drought-Affected Area: Physiology and Agronomy Appraisals. Agronomy 10: 679.
DOI: 10.3390/agronomy10050679
Phytoremediation of Heavy Metal-Contaminated Soils Using the Perennial Energy Crops Miscanthus spp. and Arundo donax L.. BioEnergy Research 8: 1500.
DOI: 10.1007/s12155-015-9688-9
Water resources constraints in achieving silk production self-sufficiency in India. Advances in Water Resources 154: 103962.
DOI: 10.1016/j.advwatres.2021.103962
Influence ofLumbricus terrestrisandFolsomia candidaon N2O formation pathways in two different soils – with particular focus on N2emissions. Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry 30: 2301.
DOI: 10.1002/rcm.7716
Towards Sustainable Wood-Based Energy: Evaluation and Strategies for Mainstreaming Sustainability in the Sector. Sustainability 11: 493.
DOI: 10.3390/su11020493
Questioning the narrative of land marginality in large-scale land acquisition deals: case study of Nansanga Farm Block in Zambia. Journal of Land Use Science 16: 188.
DOI: 10.1080/1747423X.2021.1882599
Environmental aspects of fiber crops cultivation and use. Industrial Crops and Products 68: 105.
DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2014.10.003
A Review of Trade-Offs in Low ILUC-Risk Certification for Biofuels—Towards an Integrated Assessment Framework. Sustainability 15: 16303.
DOI: 10.3390/su152316303
Miscanthus spatial location as seen by farmers: A machine learning approach to model real criteria. Biomass and Bioenergy 66: 348.
DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2014.02.035
Earthworm communities and their relation to above‐ground organic residues and water infiltration in perennial cup plant (Silphium perfoliatum) and annual silage maize (Zea mays) energy plants. Soil Use and Management 40: .
DOI: 10.1111/sum.13041
Economic and environmental performance of miscanthus cultivated on marginal land for biogas production. GCB Bioenergy 11: 34.
DOI: 10.1111/gcbb.12567
Technological pathways for bioenergy generation from municipal solid waste: Renewable energy option. Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy 38: 654.
DOI: 10.1002/ep.12981
A synthesis of the ecosystem services impact of second generation bioenergy crop production. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 46: 30.
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.02.003
Assessing the impacts of the establishment of Miscanthus on soil organic carbon on two contrasting land‐use types in Ireland. European Journal of Soil Science 64: 747.
DOI: 10.1111/ejss.12087
Morphological and physiological traits for higher biomass production in perennial rhizomatous grasses grown on marginal land. GCB Bioenergy 7: 375.
DOI: 10.1111/gcbb.12203
Earthworm functional groups respond to the perennial energy cropping system of the cup plant (Silphium perfoliatum L.). Biomass and Bioenergy 87: 61.
DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2016.02.009
Bioenergy in Europe is unlikely to make a timely contribution to climate change targets. Environmental Research Letters 19: 044004.
DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/ad2d11
Wastewater reuse for fiber crops cultivation as a strategy to mitigate desertification. Industrial Crops and Products 68: 17.
DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2014.07.007
Land availability and potential biomass production with poplar and willow short rotation coppices in Germany. GCB Bioenergy 6: 521.
DOI: 10.1111/gcbb.12083
Harvesting biofuel grasslands has mixed effects on natural enemy communities and no effects on biocontrol services. Journal of Applied Ecology 54: 2011.
DOI: 10.1111/1365-2664.12901
Economics of poplar short rotation coppice plantations on marginal land in Germany. Biomass and Bioenergy 59: 494.
DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2013.10.020
Analysing household decision-making on oil palm cultivation in Thailand. Journal of Land Use Science 11: 560.
DOI: 10.1080/1747423X.2016.1204019
Crassulacean acid metabolism (CAM) offers sustainable bioenergy production and resilience to climate change. GCB Bioenergy 8: 737.
DOI: 10.1111/gcbb.12272
Untapped Potential: Opportunities and Challenges for Sustainable Bioenergy Production from Marginal Lands in the Northeast USA. BioEnergy Research 8: 482.
DOI: 10.1007/s12155-014-9515-8
Skutki energetycznego wykorzystania biomasy. Wieś i Rolnictwo : 139.
DOI: 10.53098/wir.2015.4.169/09
Changing the Energy System towards Renewable Energy Self-Sufficiency—Towards a multi-perspective and Interdisciplinary Framework. Sustainability 6: 2822.
DOI: 10.3390/su6052822
Preliminary studies on the growth, tolerance and phytoremediation ability of sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris L.) grown on heavy metal contaminated soil. Industrial Crops and Products 107: 463.
DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2017.06.051
Perennial species mixtures for multifunctional production of biomass on marginal land. GCB Bioenergy 9: 191.
DOI: 10.1111/gcbb.12373
Food or Non-Food: Which Agricultural Feedstocks Are Best for Industrial Uses?. Industrial Biotechnology 9: 171.
DOI: 10.1089/ind.2013.1580
Geospatial supply–demand modeling of biomass residues for co‐firing in European coal power plants. GCB Bioenergy 10: 786.
DOI: 10.1111/gcbb.12532
The Role of Sequential Cropping and Biogasdoneright™ in Enhancing the Sustainability of Agricultural Systems in Europe. Agronomy 11: 2102.
DOI: 10.3390/agronomy11112102
Securing a sustainable biomass supply in a growing bioeconomy. Global Food Security 6: 34.
DOI: 10.1016/j.gfs.2015.10.001
Prospects of Bioenergy Cropping Systems for A More Social-Ecologically Sound Bioeconomy. Agronomy 9: 605.
DOI: 10.3390/agronomy9100605
Land requirements, feedstock haul distance, and expected profit response to land use restrictions for switchgrass production. Energy Economics 58: 59.
DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2016.06.019
Mapping the Land Suitability for Paddy, Corn, and Soybean in Tropical Situation of Jombang District, Indonesia. Applied and Environmental Soil Science 2024: .
DOI: 10.1155/2024/2903230
Combining phytoremediation and biorefinery: Metal extraction from lead contaminated Miscanthus during pretreatment using the ionoSolv process. Industrial Crops and Products 176: 114259.
DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2021.114259
Acute Toxic Effects of the Herbicide Formulation and the Active Ingredient Used in Cycloxydim-Tolerant Maize Cultivation on Embryos and Larvae of the African Clawed Frog, Xenopus laevis. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 94: 412.
DOI: 10.1007/s00128-015-1474-z
Evaluating the risk of pesticide exposure for amphibian species listed in Annex II of the European Union Habitats Directive. Biological Conservation 176: 64.
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2014.05.014
Perennial Grass Production Opportunities on Marginal Mediterranean Land. BioEnergy Research 8: 1523.
DOI: 10.1007/s12155-015-9692-0
Transcriptome characterization and differentially expressed genes under flooding and drought stress in the biomass grasses Phalaris arundinacea and Dactylis glomerata. Annals of Botany 124: 717.
DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcz074
A land-based approach for the environmental assessment of Mediterranean annual and perennial energy crops. European Journal of Agronomy 103: 63.
DOI: 10.1016/j.eja.2018.11.007
Bioenergy crops, biodiversity and ecosystem services in temperate agricultural landscapes—A review of synergies and trade‐offs. GCB Bioenergy 15: 1204.
DOI: 10.1111/gcbb.13092
Knowledge networks and their role in shaping the relations within the Agricultural Knowledge and Innovation System in the agroenergy sector. The case of biogas in Tuscany (Italy). Journal of Rural Studies 56: 100.
DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.09.009
Enhancement of the biogas and biofertilizer production from Opuntia heliabravoana Scheinvar. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 25: 28403.
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-018-2845-x
Biomass characterization of Agave and Opuntia as potential biofuel feedstocks. Biomass and Bioenergy 76: 43.
DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2015.03.004
Biomass production and fuel characteristics from long rotation poplar plantations. Biomass and Bioenergy 178: 106940.
DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2023.106940
Spatial-temporal variation of marginal land suitable for energy plants from 1990 to 2010 in China. Scientific Reports 4: .
DOI: 10.1038/srep05816
Soil Organic Carbon Significantly Increases When Perennial Biomass Plantations Are Reverted Back to Annual Arable Crops. Agronomy 13: 447.
DOI: 10.3390/agronomy13020447
Sustainability Potential of Marginal Areas for Food, Feed, and Non-Food Production in the Puglia Region, Southern Italy: Part II: A Review. Agronomy 14: 472.
DOI: 10.3390/agronomy14030472
IMPACTS OF BIOENERGY ON AGRICULTURAL LAND USE CHANGES IN LATVIA. Economics and Rural Development 10: 39.
DOI: 10.15544/erd.2014.005
High Nature Value farming: From indication to conservation. Ecological Indicators 57: 557.
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.05.021
Response of farmland biodiversity to the introduction of bioenergy crops: effects of local factors and surrounding landscape context. GCB Bioenergy 6: 275.
DOI: 10.1111/gcbb.12089
Food security in a changing climate. Ecohydrology & Hydrobiology 13: 8.
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecohyd.2013.03.006
Environmental impact assessment of perennial crops cultivation on marginal soils in the Mediterranean Region. Biomass and Bioenergy 111: 174.
DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2017.04.005
Comparative assessment of using Miscanthus × giganteus for remediation of soils contaminated by heavy metals: a case of military and mining sites . Environmental Science and Pollution Research 26: 13320.
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-019-04707-z
Water availability affects nectar sugar production and insect visitation of the cup plant Silphium perfoliatum L. (Asteraceae). Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 206: 529.
DOI: 10.1111/jac.12406
Current issues and uncertainties in estimating global land availability for biofuel production. Biofuels 4: 343.
DOI: 10.4155/bfs.13.27
Marginal Lands to Grow Novel Bio-Based Crops: A Plant Breeding Perspective. Frontiers in Plant Science 11: .
DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2020.00227
Marginal lands providing tree‐crop biomass as feedstock for solid biofuels. Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining 15: 1395.
DOI: 10.1002/bbb.2235
Analysing the potential for CAM-fed bio-economic uses in sub-Saharan Africa. Applied Geography 132: 102463.
DOI: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2021.102463
Abandonment or biomass production? Phytodiversity responses to land-use changes of semi-natural grasslands in northern Europe. Biological Conservation 294: 110632.
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2024.110632
Ensilability of Biomass From Effloresced Flower Strips as Co-substrate in Bioenergy Production. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology 8: .
DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2020.00014
A Critical Review on Lignocellulosic Biomass Yield Modeling and the Bioenergy Potential from Marginal Land. Agronomy 11: 2397.
DOI: 10.3390/agronomy11122397
Assessing the economic profitability of Paulownia as a biomass crop in Southern Mediterranean area. Journal of Cleaner Production 336: 130426.
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130426
The economic value of high nature value farming and the importance of the Common Agricultural Policy in sustaining income: The case study of the Natura 2000 Zarandul de Est (Romania). Journal of Rural Studies 60: 176.
DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2018.04.002
Detecting the land use of ancient transhumance routes (Tratturi) and their potential for Italian inner areas’ growth. Land Use Policy 109: 105695.
DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105695
Ensuring energy profitability and environmental sustainability through assessing marginal land suitability in China. Journal of Cleaner Production 482: 144220.
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.144220
Yield‐biodiversity trade‐off in patchy fields of Miscanthus × giganteus. GCB Bioenergy 7: 455.
DOI: 10.1111/gcbb.12167
Multiple ecosystem services provision and biomass logistics management in bioenergy buffers: A state-of-the-art review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 73: 277.
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2017.01.052
Integral analysis of environmental and economic performance of combined agricultural intensification & bioenergy production in the Orinoquia region. Journal of Environmental Management 303: 114137.
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.114137
Reviewing models of land availability and dynamics for biofuel crops in the United States and the European Union. Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining 7: 666.
DOI: 10.1002/bbb.1419
Biomass production and energy balance of herbaceous and woody crops on marginal soils in the Po Valley. GCB Bioenergy 9: 31.
DOI: 10.1111/gcbb.12341
Biorefining Potential of Wild-Grown Arundo donax, Cortaderia selloana and Phragmites australis and the Feasibility of White-Rot Fungi-Mediated Pretreatments. Frontiers in Plant Science 12: .
DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2021.679966
ECOLOGICAL AND BALANCED USE OF MARGINAL LANDS FOR GROWING ENERGY CROPS. Agriculture and Forestry : 5.
DOI: 10.37128/2707-5826-2019-3-4-1
Next generation biorefineries will solve the food, biofuels, and environmental trilemma in the energy–food–water nexus. Energy Science & Engineering 1: 27.
DOI: 10.1002/ese3.2
Assessing the economic marginality of agricultural lands in Italy to support land use planning. Land Use Policy 76: 526.
DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.02.033
From Paris agreement to business cases for upgraded biogas: Analysis of potential market uptake for biomethane plants in Germany using biogenic carbon capture and utilization technologies. Biomass and Bioenergy 120: 313.
DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2018.11.022
New Soil, Old Plants, and Ubiquitous Microbes: Evaluating the Potential of Incipient Basaltic Soil to Support Native Plant Growth and Influence Belowground Soil Microbial Community Composition. Sustainability 12: 4209.
DOI: 10.3390/su12104209
Current state of biogas production in Croatia. Energy, Sustainability and Society 10: .
DOI: 10.1186/s13705-020-0243-y
Policies for Sustainable Agriculture and Livelihood in Marginal Lands: A Review. Sustainability 13: 8692.
DOI: 10.3390/su13168692
Digestate Improves Stinging Nettle (Urtica dioica) Growth and Fiber Production at a Chlor-Alkali Site. Plants 13: 2425.
DOI: 10.3390/plants13172425
Bioenergy: Challenge or support for the conservation of biodiversity?. GCB Bioenergy 6: 180.
DOI: 10.1111/gcbb.12188
Development and use of bioenergy feedstocks for semi-arid and arid lands. Journal of Experimental Botany 66: 4177.
DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erv087
Bioenergy Production on Degraded Land: Landowner Perceptions in Central Kalimantan, Indonesia. Forests 10: 99.
DOI: 10.3390/f10020099
Yield performance of dedicated industrial crops on low‐temperature characterized marginal agricultural land in Europe – a review. Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining 16: 609.
DOI: 10.1002/bbb.2314
Assessment and quantification of marginal lands for biomass production in Europe using soil-quality indicators. SOIL 4: 267.
DOI: 10.5194/soil-4-267-2018
Environmental performance of gasified willow from different lands including land‐use changes. GCB Bioenergy 9: 756.
DOI: 10.1111/gcbb.12378
Bioenergie – Beitrag zum heutigen und zukünftigen Energiesystem. Zeitschrift für Energiewirtschaft 40: 181.
DOI: 10.1007/s12398-016-0184-5
Revitalization Potential of Marginal Areas for Sustainable Rural Development in the Puglia Region, Southern Italy: Part I: A Review. Agronomy 14: 431.
DOI: 10.3390/agronomy14030431
Consequential life cycle assessment of biogas, biofuel and biomass energy options within an arable crop rotation. GCB Bioenergy 7: 1305.
DOI: 10.1111/gcbb.12246
Integrating biomass quality variability in stochastic supply chain modeling and optimization for large-scale biofuel production. Journal of Cleaner Production 149: 904.
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.123
Biologia Futura: landscape perspectives on farmland biodiversity conservation. Biologia Futura 71: 9.
DOI: 10.1007/s42977-020-00015-7
Is switchgrass good for carbon savings? Long‐term results in marginal land. GCB Bioenergy 14: 814.
DOI: 10.1111/gcbb.12944
Identifying non-agricultural marginal lands as a route to sustainable bioenergy provision - A review and holistic definition. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 135: 110220.
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2020.110220
LCA Study of Oleaginous Bioenergy Chains in a Mediterranean Environment. Energies 7: 6258.
DOI: 10.3390/en7106258
Risk evaluation of pesticide use to protected European reptile species. Biological Conservation 191: 667.
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2015.08.002
Selected environmental impacts of the technical production of wood chips from poplar short rotation coppice on marginal land. Biomass and Bioenergy 85: 235.
DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2015.12.018
Recent Land Use Change to Agriculture in the U.S. Lake States: Impacts on Cellulosic Biomass Potential and Natural Lands. PLOS ONE 11: e0148566.
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148566
Mapping analysis of biomass residue valorization as the future green energy generation in Indonesia. Journal of Cleaner Production 354: 131667.
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131667
Method for assessing the potential of miscanthus on marginal lands for high temperature heat demand: The case studies of France and Belgium. GCB Bioenergy 15: 365.
DOI: 10.1111/gcbb.13030
Land in the EU for perennial biomass crops from freed-up agricultural land: A sensitivity analysis considering yields, diet, market liberalization and world food prices. Land Use Policy 82: 292.
DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.11.023
Environmental application and phytotoxicity of anaerobic digestate from pig farming by in vitro and in vivo trials. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology 13: 2549.
DOI: 10.1007/s13762-016-1088-y
Bioenergy, Food Production and Biodiversity – An Unlikely Alliance?. GCB Bioenergy 7: 570.
DOI: 10.1111/gcbb.12173
Bioenergy relations with agriculture, forestry and other land uses: Highlighting the specific contributions of artificial intelligence and co-citation networks. Heliyon 10: e26267.
DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26267
Integrating modern bioeconomy into macroeconomics: A comprehensive review of impacts and interactions. Bioresource Technology Reports 30: 102125.
DOI: 10.1016/j.biteb.2025.102125
The ecosystem service cascade: Further developing the metaphor. Integrating societal processes to accommodate social processes and planning, and the case of bioenergy. Ecological Economics 104: 22.
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.04.025
Cattle feed or bioenergy? Consequential life cycle assessment of biogas feedstock options on dairy farms. GCB Bioenergy 7: 1034.
DOI: 10.1111/gcbb.12189
Strategy Elements for a Sustainable Bioenergy Policy Based on Scenarios and Systems Modeling: Germany as Example. Chemical Engineering & Technology 40: 211.
DOI: 10.1002/ceat.201600259
Perennial grasslands enhance biodiversity and multiple ecosystem services in bioenergy landscapes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111: 1652.
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1309492111
Valuation of ecosystem services in alternative bioenergy landscape scenarios. GCB Bioenergy 11: 748.
DOI: 10.1111/gcbb.12602
To integrate or to segregate food crop and energy crop cultivation at the landscape scale? Perspectives on biodiversity conservation in agriculture in Europe. Energy, Sustainability and Society 6: .
DOI: 10.1186/s13705-016-0089-5
A Global Synthesis of Jatropha Cultivation: Insights into Land Use Change and Management Practices. Environmental Science & Technology 50: 8993.
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.6b01274
Biotechnology for bioenergy dedicated trees: meeting future energy demands. Zeitschrift für Naturforschung C 73: 15.
DOI: 10.1515/znc-2016-0185
Towards identifying industrial crop types and associated agronomies to improve biomass production from marginal lands in Europe. GCB Bioenergy 14: 710.
DOI: 10.1111/gcbb.12935
Low Indirect Land Use Change (ILUC) Energy Crops to Bioenergy and Biofuels—A Review. Energies 15: 4348.
DOI: 10.3390/en15124348
Perennial Biomass Crops for a Resource-Constrained World. Chapter 17: 199.
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-44530-4_17
Soils as a Key Component of the Critical Zone 1. : 187.
DOI: 10.1002/9781119438069.ch8
Bioeconomy for Beginners. Chapter 2: 11.
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-60390-1_2
WASTES 2015 – Solutions, Treatments and Opportunities. : 37.
DOI: 10.1201/b18853-8
Energie aus Biomasse. Chapter 1: 1.
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-47438-9_1
Knowledge-Driven Developments in the Bioeconomy. Chapter 10: 179.
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-58374-7_10
Land Allocation for Biomass Crops. Chapter 5: 83.
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-74536-7_5
Perennial Grasses for Bioenergy and Bioproducts. : 245.
DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-812900-5.00008-4
Microbial Biotechnology for Bioenergy. : 179.
DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-443-14112-6.00010-9
Perennial Biomass Crops for a Resource-Constrained World. Chapter 16: 191.
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-44530-4_16
Bioenergy with Carbon Capture and Storage. : 85.
DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-816229-3.00005-3
Land Allocation for Biomass Crops. Chapter 2: 7.
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-74536-7_2
Smart Bioenergy. Chapter 1: 1.
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-16193-8_1
Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Water Energy Food and Sustainability (ICoWEFS 2022). Chapter 52: 507.
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-26849-6_52
The Role of Integrity in the Governance of the Commons. Chapter 10: 155.
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-54392-5_10
Bioremediation and Bioeconomy. : 77.
DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-802830-8.00004-6
Agrarholz – Schnellwachsende Bäume in der Landwirtschaft. Chapter 12: 391.
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-49931-3_12
Exploring and Optimizing Agricultural Landscapes. Chapter 13: 303.
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-67448-9_13
ICoWEFS 2024 Sustainability Proceedings. Chapter 25: 231.
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-80330-7_25
Perennial Biomass Crops for a Resource-Constrained World. Chapter 18: 209.
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-44530-4_18
Innovations in Mechanical Engineering. Chapter 38: 410.
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-79165-0_38
Renewable Energy - Resources, Challenges and Applications. Chapter 6: .
DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.91686
Electrokinetics Across Disciplines and Continents. Chapter 19: 373.
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-20179-5_19
Energy from Organic Materials (Biomass). Chapter 991: 1299.
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-7813-7_991
Encyclopedia of Sustainability Science and Technology. Chapter 991-1: 1.
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-2493-6_991-1
Concepts and Instruments for a Rational Bioenergy Policy. Chapter 4: 193.
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-31135-7_4
Forage Crops in the Bioenergy Revolution. Chapter 6: 93.
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-96-2536-9_6
The Marginal Soils of Africa. Chapter 12: 229.
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-55185-7_12
Managing Global Warming. : 379.
DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-814104-5.00012-0
Bioökonomie für Einsteiger. Chapter 2: 11.
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-53763-3_2
Encyclopedia of Sustainability Science and Technology. Chapter 259-3: 1.
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-2493-6_259-3
Energy from Organic Materials (Biomass). Chapter 259: 299.
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-7813-7_259
Forage Crops in the Bioenergy Revolution. Chapter 19: 385.
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-96-2536-9_19
Bioeconomy. Chapter 6: 97.
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-68152-8_6
Subscribe to email alerts for current Article's categories