Related articles by
Review Article
Other versions:
- Article InfoArticle Info
- CiteCite
- MetricsMetrics
- CommentComment
- RelatedRelated
- CitedCited
Bioenergy and climate change mitigation: an assessment. GCB Bioenergy 7: 916.
Exploring the potential of grass feedstock from marginal land in Ireland: Does marginal mean lower yield?. Biomass and Bioenergy 107: 361.
Widespread production of bioenergy: land and water availability factors. Biofuels 8: 623.
Biogas production from coumarin-rich plants—inhibition by coumarin and recovery by adaptation of the bacterial community. FEMS Microbiology Ecology 91: fiv103.
A novel composite environmental fragility index to analyse Italian ecoregions’ vulnerability. Land Use Policy 122: 106352.
Conclusive Results of the European Project OPTIMA: Optimization of Perennial Grasses for Biomass Production in the Mediterranean Area. BioEnergy Research 8: 1459.
Drought‐tolerant succulent plants as an alternative crop under future global warming scenarios in sub‐Saharan Africa. GCB Bioenergy 15: 1287.
Associative nitrogen fixation linked with three perennial bioenergy grasses in field and greenhouse experiments. GCB Bioenergy 12: 1104.
Advanced biofuels to decarbonise European transport by 2030: Markets, challenges, and policies that impact their successful market uptake. Energy Strategy Reviews 34: 100633.
Marginal Agricultural Land Low-Input Systems for Biomass Production. Energies 12: 3123.
Biodiversity impacts of bioenergy crop production: a state‐of‐the‐art review. GCB Bioenergy 6: 183.
Environmental consequences of the conversion from traditional to energy cropping systems in a Mediterranean area. European Journal of Agronomy 70: 124.
Concepts of agricultural marginal lands and their utilisation: A review. Agricultural Systems 204: 103560.
Valuation of ecosystem services of commercial shrub willow (Salix spp.) woody biomass crops. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 189: .
Wild Miscanthus Germplasm in a Drought-Affected Area: Physiology and Agronomy Appraisals. Agronomy 10: 679.
Phytoremediation of Heavy Metal-Contaminated Soils Using the Perennial Energy Crops Miscanthus spp. and Arundo donax L.. BioEnergy Research 8: 1500.
Water resources constraints in achieving silk production self-sufficiency in India. Advances in Water Resources 154: 103962.
Influence ofLumbricus terrestrisandFolsomia candidaon N2O formation pathways in two different soils - with particular focus on N2emissions. Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry 30: 2301.
Towards Sustainable Wood-Based Energy: Evaluation and Strategies for Mainstreaming Sustainability in the Sector. Sustainability 11: 493.
Questioning the narrative of land marginality in large-scale land acquisition deals: case study of Nansanga Farm Block in Zambia. Journal of Land Use Science 16: 188.
Environmental aspects of fiber crops cultivation and use. Industrial Crops and Products 68: 105.
Miscanthus spatial location as seen by farmers: A machine learning approach to model real criteria. Biomass and Bioenergy 66: 348.
Economic and environmental performance of miscanthus cultivated on marginal land for biogas production. GCB Bioenergy 11: 34.
Technological pathways for bioenergy generation from municipal solid waste: Renewable energy option. Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy 38: 654.
A synthesis of the ecosystem services impact of second generation bioenergy crop production. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 46: 30.
Assessing the impacts of the establishment ofMiscanthuson soil organic carbon on two contrasting land-use types in Ireland. European Journal of Soil Science 64: 747.
Morphological and physiological traits for higher biomass production in perennial rhizomatous grasses grown on marginal land. GCB Bioenergy 7: 375.
Earthworm functional groups respond to the perennial energy cropping system of the cup plant (Silphium perfoliatum L.). Biomass and Bioenergy 87: 61.
Wastewater reuse for fiber crops cultivation as a strategy to mitigate desertification. Industrial Crops and Products 68: 17.
Land availability and potential biomass production with poplar and willow short rotation coppices in Germany. GCB Bioenergy 6: 521.
Harvesting biofuel grasslands has mixed effects on natural enemy communities and no effects on biocontrol services. Journal of Applied Ecology 54: 2011.
Economics of poplar short rotation coppice plantations on marginal land in Germany. Biomass and Bioenergy 59: 494.
Analysing household decision-making on oil palm cultivation in Thailand. Journal of Land Use Science 11: 560.
Crassulacean acid metabolism (CAM) offers sustainable bioenergy production and resilience to climate change. GCB Bioenergy 8: 737.
Untapped Potential: Opportunities and Challenges for Sustainable Bioenergy Production from Marginal Lands in the Northeast USA. BioEnergy Research 8: 482.
Changing the Energy System towards Renewable Energy Self-Sufficiency—Towards a multi-perspective and Interdisciplinary Framework. Sustainability 6: 2822.
Preliminary studies on the growth, tolerance and phytoremediation ability of sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris L.) grown on heavy metal contaminated soil. Industrial Crops and Products 107: 463.
Perennial species mixtures for multifunctional production of biomass on marginal land. GCB Bioenergy 9: 191.
Food or Non-Food: Which Agricultural Feedstocks Are Best for Industrial Uses?. Industrial Biotechnology 9: 171.
Geospatial supply–demand modeling of biomass residues for co‐firing in European coal power plants. GCB Bioenergy 10: 786.
The Role of Sequential Cropping and Biogasdoneright™ in Enhancing the Sustainability of Agricultural Systems in Europe. Agronomy 11: 2102.
Securing a sustainable biomass supply in a growing bioeconomy. Global Food Security 6: 34.
Prospects of Bioenergy Cropping Systems for A More Social-Ecologically Sound Bioeconomy. Agronomy 9: 605.
Land requirements, feedstock haul distance, and expected profit response to land use restrictions for switchgrass production. Energy Economics 58: 59.
Combining phytoremediation and biorefinery: Metal extraction from lead contaminated Miscanthus during pretreatment using the ionoSolv process. Industrial Crops and Products 176: 114259.
Acute Toxic Effects of the Herbicide Formulation and the Active Ingredient Used in Cycloxydim-Tolerant Maize Cultivation on Embryos and Larvae of the African Clawed Frog, Xenopus laevis. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 94: 412.
Evaluating the risk of pesticide exposure for amphibian species listed in Annex II of the European Union Habitats Directive. Biological Conservation 176: 64.
Perennial Grass Production Opportunities on Marginal Mediterranean Land. BioEnergy Research 8: 1523.
Transcriptome characterization and differentially expressed genes under flooding and drought stress in the biomass grasses Phalaris arundinacea and Dactylis glomerata. Annals of Botany 124: 717.
A land-based approach for the environmental assessment of Mediterranean annual and perennial energy crops. European Journal of Agronomy 103: 63.
Bioenergy crops, biodiversity and ecosystem services in temperate agricultural landscapes—A review of synergies and trade‐offs. GCB Bioenergy 15: 1204.
Knowledge networks and their role in shaping the relations within the Agricultural Knowledge and Innovation System in the agroenergy sector. The case of biogas in Tuscany (Italy). Journal of Rural Studies 56: 100.
Enhancement of the biogas and biofertilizer production from Opuntia heliabravoana Scheinvar. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 25: 28403.
Biomass characterization of Agave and Opuntia as potential biofuel feedstocks. Biomass and Bioenergy 76: 43.
Spatial-temporal variation of marginal land suitable for energy plants from 1990 to 2010 in China. Scientific Reports 4: .
Soil Organic Carbon Significantly Increases When Perennial Biomass Plantations Are Reverted Back to Annual Arable Crops. Agronomy 13: 447.
IMPACTS OF BIOENERGY ON AGRICULTURAL LAND USE CHANGES IN LATVIA. Economics and Rural Development 10: 39.
High Nature Value farming: From indication to conservation. Ecological Indicators 57: 557.
Response of farmland biodiversity to the introduction of bioenergy crops: effects of local factors and surrounding landscape context. GCB Bioenergy 6: 275.
Food security in a changing climate. Ecohydrology & Hydrobiology 13: 8.
Environmental impact assessment of perennial crops cultivation on marginal soils in the Mediterranean Region. Biomass and Bioenergy 111: 174.
Comparative assessment of using Miscanthus × giganteus for remediation of soils contaminated by heavy metals: a case of military and mining sites . Environmental Science and Pollution Research 26: 13320.
Water availability affects nectar sugar production and insect visitation of the cup plant Silphium perfoliatum L. (Asteraceae). Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 206: 529.
Current issues and uncertainties in estimating global land availability for biofuel production. Biofuels 4: 343.
Marginal Lands to Grow Novel Bio-Based Crops: A Plant Breeding Perspective. Frontiers in Plant Science 11: .
Marginal lands providing tree‐crop biomass as feedstock for solid biofuels. Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining 15: 1395.
Analysing the potential for CAM-fed bio-economic uses in sub-Saharan Africa. Applied Geography 132: 102463.
Ensilability of Biomass From Effloresced Flower Strips as Co-substrate in Bioenergy Production. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology 8: .
A Critical Review on Lignocellulosic Biomass Yield Modeling and the Bioenergy Potential from Marginal Land. Agronomy 11: 2397.
Assessing the economic profitability of Paulownia as a biomass crop in Southern Mediterranean area. Journal of Cleaner Production 336: 130426.
The economic value of high nature value farming and the importance of the Common Agricultural Policy in sustaining income: The case study of the Natura 2000 Zarandul de Est (Romania). Journal of Rural Studies 60: 176.
Detecting the land use of ancient transhumance routes (Tratturi) and their potential for Italian inner areas’ growth. Land Use Policy 109: 105695.
Yield-biodiversity trade-off in patchy fields ofMiscanthus × giganteus. GCB Bioenergy 7: 455.
Multiple ecosystem services provision and biomass logistics management in bioenergy buffers: A state-of-the-art review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 73: 277.
Integral analysis of environmental and economic performance of combined agricultural intensification & bioenergy production in the Orinoquia region. Journal of Environmental Management 303: 114137.
Reviewing models of land availability and dynamics for biofuel crops in the United States and the European Union. Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining 7: 666.
Biomass production and energy balance of herbaceous and woody crops on marginal soils in the Po Valley. GCB Bioenergy 9: 31.
Biorefining Potential of Wild-Grown Arundo donax, Cortaderia selloana and Phragmites australis and the Feasibility of White-Rot Fungi-Mediated Pretreatments. Frontiers in Plant Science 12: .
ECOLOGICAL AND BALANCED USE OF MARGINAL LANDS FOR GROWING ENERGY CROPS. Agriculture and Forestry : 5.
Next generation biorefineries will solve the food, biofuels, and environmental trilemma in the energy–food–water nexus. Energy Science & Engineering 1: 27.
Assessing the economic marginality of agricultural lands in Italy to support land use planning. Land Use Policy 76: 526.
From Paris agreement to business cases for upgraded biogas: Analysis of potential market uptake for biomethane plants in Germany using biogenic carbon capture and utilization technologies. Biomass and Bioenergy 120: 313.
New Soil, Old Plants, and Ubiquitous Microbes: Evaluating the Potential of Incipient Basaltic Soil to Support Native Plant Growth and Influence Belowground Soil Microbial Community Composition. Sustainability 12: 4209.
Current state of biogas production in Croatia. Energy, Sustainability and Society 10: .
Policies for Sustainable Agriculture and Livelihood in Marginal Lands: A Review. Sustainability 13: 8692.
Bioenergy: Challenge or support for the conservation of biodiversity?. GCB Bioenergy 6: 180.
Development and use of bioenergy feedstocks for semi-arid and arid lands. Journal of Experimental Botany 66: 4177.
Bioenergy Production on Degraded Land: Landowner Perceptions in Central Kalimantan, Indonesia. Forests 10: 99.
Yield performance of dedicated industrial crops on low‐temperature characterized marginal agricultural land in Europe – a review. Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining 16: 609.
Assessment and quantification of marginal lands for biomass production in Europe using soil-quality indicators. SOIL 4: 267.
Environmental performance of gasified willow from different lands including land‐use changes. GCB Bioenergy 9: 756.
Bioenergie – Beitrag zum heutigen und zukünftigen Energiesystem. Zeitschrift für Energiewirtschaft 40: 181.
Consequential life cycle assessment of biogas, biofuel and biomass energy options within an arable crop rotation. GCB Bioenergy 7: 1305.
Integrating biomass quality variability in stochastic supply chain modeling and optimization for large-scale biofuel production. Journal of Cleaner Production 149: 904.
Biologia Futura: landscape perspectives on farmland biodiversity conservation. Biologia Futura 71: 9.
Is switchgrass good for carbon savings? Long‐term results in marginal land. GCB Bioenergy 14: 814.
Identifying non-agricultural marginal lands as a route to sustainable bioenergy provision - A review and holistic definition. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 135: 110220.
LCA Study of Oleaginous Bioenergy Chains in a Mediterranean Environment. Energies 7: 6258.
Risk evaluation of pesticide use to protected European reptile species. Biological Conservation 191: 667.
Selected environmental impacts of the technical production of wood chips from poplar short rotation coppice on marginal land. Biomass and Bioenergy 85: 235.
Recent Land Use Change to Agriculture in the U.S. Lake States: Impacts on Cellulosic Biomass Potential and Natural Lands. PLOS ONE 11: e0148566.
Mapping analysis of biomass residue valorization as the future green energy generation in Indonesia. Journal of Cleaner Production 354: 131667.
Method for assessing the potential of miscanthus on marginal lands for high temperature heat demand: The case studies of France and Belgium. GCB Bioenergy 15: 365.
Land in the EU for perennial biomass crops from freed-up agricultural land: A sensitivity analysis considering yields, diet, market liberalization and world food prices. Land Use Policy 82: 292.
Environmental application and phytotoxicity of anaerobic digestate from pig farming by in vitro and in vivo trials. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology 13: 2549.
Bioenergy, Food Production and Biodiversity – An Unlikely Alliance?. GCB Bioenergy 7: 570.
The ecosystem service cascade: Further developing the metaphor. Integrating societal processes to accommodate social processes and planning, and the case of bioenergy. Ecological Economics 104: 22.
Cattle feed or bioenergy? Consequential life cycle assessment of biogas feedstock options on dairy farms. GCB Bioenergy 7: 1034.
Strategy Elements for a Sustainable Bioenergy Policy Based on Scenarios and Systems Modeling: Germany as Example. Chemical Engineering & Technology 40: 211.
Perennial grasslands enhance biodiversity and multiple ecosystem services in bioenergy landscapes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111: 1652.
Valuation of ecosystem services in alternative bioenergy landscape scenarios. GCB Bioenergy 11: 748.
To integrate or to segregate food crop and energy crop cultivation at the landscape scale? Perspectives on biodiversity conservation in agriculture in Europe. Energy, Sustainability and Society 6: .
A Global Synthesis of Jatropha Cultivation: Insights into Land Use Change and Management Practices. Environmental Science & Technology 50: 8993.
Biotechnology for bioenergy dedicated trees: meeting future energy demands. Zeitschrift für Naturforschung C 73: 15.
Towards identifying industrial crop types and associated agronomies to improve biomass production from marginal lands in Europe. GCB Bioenergy 14: 710.
Low Indirect Land Use Change (ILUC) Energy Crops to Bioenergy and Biofuels—A Review. Energies 15: 4348.
Perennial Biomass Crops for a Resource-Constrained World. Chapter 17: 199.
Soils as a Key Component of the Critical Zone 1. : 187.
Bioeconomy for Beginners. Chapter 2: 11.
WASTES 2015 – Solutions, Treatments and Opportunities. : 37.
Energie aus Biomasse. Chapter 1: 1.
Knowledge-Driven Developments in the Bioeconomy. Chapter 10: 179.
Land Allocation for Biomass Crops. Chapter 5: 83.
Perennial Grasses for Bioenergy and Bioproducts. : 245.
Perennial Biomass Crops for a Resource-Constrained World. Chapter 16: 191.
Bioenergy with Carbon Capture and Storage. : 85.
Land Allocation for Biomass Crops. Chapter 2: 7.
Smart Bioenergy. Chapter 1: 1.
Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Water Energy Food and Sustainability (ICoWEFS 2022). Chapter 52: 507.
The Role of Integrity in the Governance of the Commons. Chapter 10: 155.
Bioremediation and Bioeconomy. : 77.
Agrarholz – Schnellwachsende Bäume in der Landwirtschaft. Chapter 12: 391.
Exploring and Optimizing Agricultural Landscapes. Chapter 13: 303.
Perennial Biomass Crops for a Resource-Constrained World. Chapter 18: 209.
Innovations in Mechanical Engineering. Chapter 38: 410.
Renewable Energy - Resources, Challenges and Applications. Chapter 6: .
Electrokinetics Across Disciplines and Continents. Chapter 19: 373.
Energy from Organic Materials (Biomass). Chapter 991: 1299.
Encyclopedia of Sustainability Science and Technology. Chapter 991-1: 1.
Concepts and Instruments for a Rational Bioenergy Policy. Chapter 4: 193.
Managing Global Warming. : 379.
Bioökonomie für Einsteiger. Chapter 2: 11.
Encyclopedia of Sustainability Science and Technology. Chapter 259-3: 1.
Energy from Organic Materials (Biomass). Chapter 259: 299.
Bioeconomy. Chapter 6: 97.
Subscribe to email alerts for current Article's categories (Subject, Taxon)