Research Article |
Corresponding author: Teodora Todorova ( tedi_todorova@yahoo.com ) Academic editor: Kalina Danova
© 2022 Teodora Todorova, Krassimir Boyadzhiev, Aleksandar Shkondrov, Petya Parvanova, Maria Dimitrova, Iliana Ionkova, Ilina Krasteva, Ekaterina Kozuharova, Stephka Chankova.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Todorova T, Boyadzhiev K, Shkondrov A, Parvanova P, Dimitrova M, Ionkova I, Krasteva I, Kozuharova E, Chankova S (2022) Screening of Amorpha fruticosa and Ailanthus altissima extracts for genotoxicity/antigenotoxicity, mutagenicity/antimutagenicity and carcinogenicity/anticarcinogenicity. In: Chankova S, Peneva V, Metcheva R, Beltcheva M, Vassilev K, Radeva G, Danova K (Eds) Current trends of ecology. BioRisk 17: 201-212. https://doi.org/10.3897/biorisk.17.77327
|
The aim of the present study was to evaluate the potential genotoxic/antigenotoxic, mutagenic/antimutagenic, and carcinogenic/anticarcinogenic effect of Amorpha fruticosa (AF) fruit, Ailanthus altissima bark hexane (AAEH) and methanol (AAEM) extracts on a model system Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Plants were identified and extracted by Ekaterina Kozuharova. Three concentrations of each extract were tested – 10, 100 and 1000 µg/ml. In vitro pro-oxidant/antioxidant activities were evaluated by DPPH and DNA topology assay. The potential genotoxic/antigenotoxic, mutagenic/antimutagenic and carcinogenic/anticarcinogenic effects were revealed in vivo by: Zimmermman’s test on Saccharomyces cerevisiae diploid strain D7ts1, and Ty1 retrotransposition test on S. cerevisiae haploid strain 551. Zeocin was used as a positive control.
Based on the in vitro antioxidant activity the extracts could be arranged as follows: AF>AAEM>AAEH. AAEH possessed moderate oxidative potential. No genotoxic and mutagenic capacity was obtained in vivo for extracts tested. The levels of total aberrants, convertants and revertants were comparable with the control ones. No Ty1 retrotransposition was induced by extracts treatment. Further, the extracts possessed well-expressed antigenotoxic, antimutagenic and anticarcinogenic activity. Significant reduction of the total aberrants, reverse point mutations and Ty1 retrotransposition was obtained. Only the AF extract was found to reduce the levels of zeocin-induced mitotic gene conversion.
The three extracts did not possess any genotoxic, mutagenic and carcinogenic effect on Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Based on their protective activity, they can be arranged as follows: AF>AAEM>AAEH which corresponds well with their phytochemical composition. Further experiments could provide more detailed information concerning the mode of action of extracts, as well as their main constituents.
Ailanthus altissima, Amorpha fruticose, carcinogenic/anticarcinogenic, genotoxicity/antigenotoxicity, mutagenic/antimutagenic effect
Invasive plant species are considered to be one of the main reasons for biodiversity loss (
A. fruticosa L. (Fabaceae), known as false indigo, false indigo-bush, and bastard indigobush is a shrub native to North America (
A. altissima (Mill.) Swingle (Simaroubaceae), known as the tree of heaven is native in China. It was introduced in Europe and North America around the end of the 18th century (
Both plants are used in traditional medicine. A. altissima is often applied for the treatment of asthma, epilepsy, spermatorrhea, bleeding, ascariasis, cold, gastric (dysentery) and ophthalmic diseases, etc. (
It the present work we hypothesized that A. fruticosa fruit extract and A. altissima bark extract would be safe and could decrease the zeocin-induced mutagenic, recombinogenic and carcinogenic effects on Saccharomyces cerevisiae model organism. As these plant species are very invasive growing almost unrestrictedly, they can provide abundant and cheap resources of bioactive compounds. Their pharmacological application may lead to excessive harvesting and thus, a decrease in their populations as a strategy for the protection of native plant habitats. Both plants are promising candidates for the pharmacology. Even though, data in literature point out that the toxicity evaluation of the plant extracts is scarce (
Thus, the aim of the present study was to evaluate the potential genotoxic/antigenotoxic, mutagenic/antimutagenic and carcinogenic/anticarcinogenic effect of A. fruticosa fruit extract (AF) and A. altissima bark hexane (AAEH) and methanol (AAEM) extracts on Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Fruits of Amorpha fruticosa were collected in October 2018 from a location near Pasarel village, Sofia district. Stem bark of Ajlanthus altissima was collected in September 2018 from a location in Sofia, Bulgaria. The plant materials were dried at room temperature, then pulverized and sieved. The fruits of A. fruticosa were macerated with chloroform to remove the lipophilic compounds (both the fixed and the essential oils), and then the material was dried and extracted by percolation with 70% methanol. The solvent was evaporated on a rotary evaporator; then the extract was lyophilized and named AF. The stem bark of A. altissima was macerated with hexane to produce the lipophilic extract, which was dried in vacuo and named AAEH. The resulting defatted substance was percolated with 70% methanol to obtain the hydrophilic extract, which was concentrated, lyophilized and named AAEM.
The DPPH assay, based on a color reduction of DPPH hydrate from purple to yellow, was applied as described in
DNA topology assay was applied according to
Stock solutions of A. altissima hexane (AAEH) and methanol (AAEM) extracts dissolved in 0.1% Tween 20 and A. fruticosa (AF) extract dissolved in sterile MQ water were prepared prior to the experiments. Cell suspensions (1×107 cells/ml) to the end of the exponential and the beginning of stationary growth phase were pre-treated with three concentrations – 10, 100 and 1000 µg/ml of AAEH, AAEM and AF extracts for 30 min at optimal conditions (30 °C, 200 rpm). Cells were then washed and after that treated with 100 µg/ml Zeocin for 1 min. Single treatment with Zeocin was used as a positive control. After these procedures, cells were harvested, washed and prepared for further work.
Zimmerman’s test was applied on Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain D7ts1 as described in
The Ty1 retrotransposition test applied for in vivo detection of carcinogenic effect was used as described by
The statistical analysis includes an application of One-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s post hoc test. P<0.05 was accepted as the lowest level of statistical significance. Concentrations inducing 50% inhibition of the cell growth (IC50 values) were calculated using non-linear regression analysis (GraphPad Prizm5 Software).
Preliminary chemical analysis reveals differences among the chemical composition of the extracts: AF fruit extract is rich of flavonoids and stilbenoids (amorfrutins A and B) as it was described previously by (
Slight to moderate radical scavenging activity of the extracts in comparison with the standard control ascorbic acid was obtained. Based on DPPH assay (Fig.
To evaluate the oxidative potential of the extracts DNA topology assay was performed. This assay provides information not only about the oxidative/antioxidant but also on the DNA damaging/protective effect of the tested extracts. Based on the calculated relative quantity of supercoiled DNA the extracts could be arranged as follows: AF>AAEM>AAEH (Fig.
Comparing antioxidant properties of the extracts, the moderate protection of AAEH was detected depending on the concentration – 500 and 1000 µg/mL. AF and AAEM did not show good antioxidant properties towards the hydroxyl anions (Fig.
Radical scavenging activity (%) of Amorpha fruticosa, Ailanthus altissima methanolic and hexane extract. Data are presented mean values from at least three independent experiments.
Agarose gel electrophoresis for studying possible DNA damaging effect. Agarose gel electrophoretic patterns of plasmid DNA treated with A. fruticosa L. A Ailanthus altissima methanolic B and hexane C extract in the absence of Fe3+ ions (0.08 mM): lane 1 – DNA control; lane 2 – Fe2+ ions control; lane 3 – 10 µg/mL extract; lane 4 – 100 µg/mL extract; lane 5 – 500 µg/mL extract; lane 6 – 1000 µg/mL extract D Densitometrical estimation of the relative quantity of supercoiled DNA.
Agarose gel electrophoresis for studying possible DNA protective effect against Fe2+ ions. Agarose gel electrophoretic patterns of plasmid DNA treated with A. fruticosa L. A Ailanthus altissima methanolic B and hexane C extract in the presence of Fe3+ ions (0.08 mM): lane 1 – DNA control; lane 2 – Fe2+ ions control; lane 3 – Fe2+ ions and 10 µg/mL extract; lane 4 – Fe2+ ions and 100 µg/mL extract; lane 5 – Fe2+ ions and 500 µg/mL extract; lane 6 - Fe2+ ions and 1000 µg/mL extract D Densitometrical estimation of the relative quantity of supercoiled DNA.
The survival after the treatments was comparable with the negative control – untreated cells. No effect was obtained regarding the genetic events – convertant and revertant frequencies as well as total aberrants (Table
Frequency of gene conversion in trp5 locus, reversion in ilv1-92 allele and mitotic crossing-over in ade2 locus after single treatment of S. cerevisiae D7ts1 with 10, 100 and 1000 µg/ml AF, AAEM and AAEH. Zeocin was used as a positive control.
Extract concentration (µg/ml) | Zeocin (µg/ml) | Survival (%) | Gene conversion/ 105 cells | Reversion/ 106 cells | Total aberrants (%) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | 100 | 1.02±0.01 | 0.003±0.0002 | 0.437±0.021*** | |
0 | 100 | 32.99±2.75*** | 4.30±0.7*** | 0.038±0.0005*** | 2.331±0.667*** | |
AF | 10 | 0 | 99.62±1.21*** | 1.05±0.05*** | 0.002±0.00009*** | 0.576±0.150*** |
100 | 0 | 99.05±3.93*** | 1.07±0.01*** | 0.002±0.0001*** | 0.741±0.163*** | |
1000 | 0 | 99.97±1.64*** | 1.07±0.07*** | 0.001±0.00004*** | 0.507±0.013*** | |
AAEM | 10 | 0 | 99.41±2.13*** | 1.15±0.05*** | 0.002±0.00005*** | 0.498±0.130*** |
100 | 0 | 99.37±3.01*** | 1.13±0.03*** | 0.003±0.00005*** | 0.501±0.021*** | |
1000 | 0 | 98.31±1.59*** | 1.16±0.07*** | 0.002±0.00009*** | 0.542±0.043** | |
AAEH | 10 | 0 | 96.47±1.98*** | 1.90±0.08*** | 0.004±0.00006*** | 0.602±0.046** |
100 | 0 | 89.11±2.04*** | 1.60±0.05*** | 0.004±0.00002*** | 0.689±0.016** | |
1000 | 0 | 97.14±2.43*** | 2.02±0.04*** | 0.006±0.00001*** | 0.802±0.112** |
Concerning the antimutagenic properties, an increase in the cell survival in comparison with the positive control was measured after all the treatments. Significant reduction of the reverse mutations to levels comparable with that in untreated control was obtained after the pre-treatment with AF and AAEM without concentration’s effect. Around 2.5-fold lower levels were measured after pre-treatment with 10 µg/ml AAEH (Table
Frequency of gene conversion in trp5 locus, reversion in ilv1-92 allele and mitotic crossing-over in ade2 locus after pre-treatment of S. cerevisiae D7ts1 with 10, 100 and 1000 µg/ml AF, AAEM or AAEH followed by treatment with 100 µg/ml Zeocin.
Extract concentration (µg/ml) | Zeocin (µg/ml) | Survival (%) | Gene conversion/ 105 cells | Reversion/ 106 cells | Total aberrants (%) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | 100 | 0.52±0.01 | 0.003±0.0002 | 0.437±0.021 | |
0 | 100 | 32.99±2.75*** | 4.30±0.70*** | 0.038±0.0005*** | 2.331±0.667*** | |
AF | 10 | 100 | 94.93±4.08*** | 0.75±0.50 *** | 0.005±0.0009*** | 0.56±0.16** |
100 | 100 | 77.54±1.51*** | 0.81±0.10 *** | 0.006±0.0002*** | 0.74±0.13** | |
1000 | 100 | 71.01±9.07*** | 0.76±0.09 *** | 0.005±0.0004*** | 0.50±0.03** | |
AAEM | 10 | 100 | 87.68±1.46*** | 2.34±0.84 ns | 0.021±0.0006*** | 1.51±0.035 ns |
100 | 100 | 76.83±2.41*** | 3.20±0.57 ns | 0.005±0.00014*** | 0.57±0.056 ** | |
1000 | 100 | 58.06±2.11*** | 2.84±0.39 ns | 0.006±0.00057*** | 0.76±0.03 ** | |
AAEH | 10 | 100 | 77.71±3.65*** | 6.93±0.79* | 0.014±0.0035*** | 1.13±0.078 * |
100 | 100 | 71.55±4.59*** | 3.89±0.53 ns | 0.031±0.0046 ns | 0.92±0.09 ** | |
1000 | 100 | 84.60±1.24*** | 2.90±0.67 ns | 0.032±0.0086 ns | 0.85±0.05 ** |
Data revealed that single treatment with 1000 µg/ml AF possesses slight dose-dependent genotoxic effect, reducing the cell survival of strain 551 to 78% (Fig.
Further, well expressed anti-carcinogenic activity, measured as a reduction of the transposition rate to levels comparable with the negative control is defined when pre-treatment with concentrations of AF and AAEH is applied (Fig.
Slight to moderate antioxidant activity in vitro of extracts is identified. Such activity of Amorpha fruticosa does not correspond to data published by
Our in vivo experiments were performed on Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Saccharomyces cerevisiae has been chosen as a model system for human cell due to the similarities in main stress response pathways (discussed in
The results obtained by us reveal that the three extracts do not affect the cell survival, the mitotic gene conversion in trp5 locus, reversion in ilv1-92 allele, mitotic crossing-over in ade2 locus and Ty1 retrotransposition. From our point of knowledge this is the first finding that Amorpha fruticosa fruit extract and Ailanthus altissima bark extracts are not genotoxic, mutagenic and carcinogenic in our test-system.
Our research has been extended in order to evaluate the possible antigenotoxic, antimutagenic and anticarcinogenic potential of the extracts against the action of the radiomimetic Zeocin. Zeocin was chosen as a damaging agent due to several reasons: it is a radiomimetic, member of the bleomycin family of antibiotics, that damages DNA in a way similar to that of ionizing radiation; possesses pro-oxidative capacity (
In this study it was demonstrated that pre-treatment with extracts could protect cells from the genotoxic action of Zeocin measured as cell survival. No relation between the cell survival and pre-treatment concentrations was identified. Concerning the antimutagenic capacity of extracts the specificity of their action was obvious. Significant reduction of the total aberrants was obtained after the treatment with the extracts. The only extract reducing the mitotic gene conversion was AF. No effect was observed after the pre-treatment with AAEM. A significant increase in the levels of this genetic event was measured when pre-treatment with 10 µg/ml AAEH which is in accordance with another study where sterols are reported to potentiate the activity of another member of the zeocin family – bleomycin (
On the other side, significant amelioration of the reverse point mutations and Ty1 retrotransposition was observed. It is well known that the antimutagenic and anticarcinogenic properties could be related to significant antioxidant activity or to activation of DNA repair processes. As in our in vitro experiments evidence was provided for mild to moderate antioxidant activity of extracts tested, it could be suggested that in this case the reduction of the genetic events is not related to the antioxidant potential. Having in mind that the reverse mutation frequency is used for measurement of error prone recombination (
From our point of knowledge for the first time it was shown by us that Amorpha fruticosa fruit extract and Ailanthus altissima bark extracts possess no genotoxic, mutagenic and carcinogenic capacity on a model system Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Based on their protective activity, they can be arranged as follows: AF>AAEM>AAEH that corresponds well with their phytochemical composition. Further experiments could provide more detailed information concerning the mode of action of extracts, as well as their main constituents.
This work has been carried out in the framework of the National Science Program “Environmental Protection and Reduction of Risks of Adverse Events and Natural Disasters”, approved by the Resolution of the Council of Ministers N° 577/17.08.2018 and supported by the Ministry of Education and Science (MES) of Bulgaria (Agreement N° Д01-363/17.12.2020).