Research Article
Print
Research Article
Correlation between bacterial abundance, soil properties and heavy metal contamination in the area of non-ferrous metal processing plant, Southern Bulgaria
expand article infoRadina Nikolova‡, Michaella Petkova‡, Nikolai Dinev§, Anelia Kenarova|, Silvena Boteva|, Dimitar Berov, Galina Radeva‡
‡ Roumen Tsanev Institute of Molecular Biology, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Sofia, Bulgaria
§ N. Poushkarov Institute of Soil Science, Agrotechnologies and Plant Protection, Sofia, Bulgaria
| Sofia University “St. Kl. Ohridski”, Sofia, Bulgaria
¶ Institute of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Research, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Sofia, Bulgaria

Corresponding author: Galina Radeva ( galrad@abv.bg )

Academic editor: Michaela Beltcheva
© 2022 Radina Nikolova, Michaella Petkova, Nikolai Dinev, Anelia Kenarova, Silvena Boteva, Dimitar Berov, Galina Radeva.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation: Nikolova R, Petkova M, Dinev N, Kenarova A, Boteva S, Berov D, Radeva G (2022) Correlation between bacterial abundance, soil properties and heavy metal contamination in the area of non-ferrous metal processing plant, Southern Bulgaria. In: Chankova S, Peneva V, Metcheva R, Beltcheva M, Vassilev K, Radeva G, Danova K (Eds) Current trends of ecology. BioRisk 17: 19-30. https://doi.org/10.3897/biorisk.17.77458
Open Access

Abstract

In the present study, the correlation between bacterial abundance and soil physicochemical properties along the heavy metal contamination gradient in the area of non-ferrous metal processing plant was assessed. Our results showed that bacterial abundance (number of heterotrophic bacteria and number of 16S rRNA gene copies) decreased with 45–56% (CFU) and 54–87% (16S rRNA gene) along the Zn, Pb and Cd contamination gradient. The total bacterial abundance (16S rRNA gene) increased exponentially in contrast to the abundance of heterotrophic bacteria. The reduction of bacterial abundance in heavily contaminated soil indicated that the soil properties (soil pH, total organic carbon, inorganic ions, soil texture) could modify the effects of heavy metals and the response of microorganisms to that stress in long-term contaminated soils.

Keywords

Bacterial abundance, 16S rRNA gene, heavy metals, soil contamination, soil properties

Introduction

Soil sustains a great abundance and diversity of microorganisms, which modify its physical and chemical environment and play an essential role in the mineralization of organic matter and nutrient recycling (Martinez-Toledo et al. 2021). Microbial communities are strongly susceptible to soil physicochemical properties and to the effect of various soil pollutants, such as heavy metals (HMs). HMs are one of the most common pollutants, which accumulate in soils of industrial and mining areas. The most common HMs found in contaminated sites are Zn, Cd and particularly Pb (Wuana and Okieimen 2011; Fajardo et al. 2019). Long-term contamination with HMs is a threat to human health and ecosystems due to their non-biodegradability, bioaccumulation, environmental stability, persistence and biotoxicity characteristics (Ali et al. 2021).

Previous studies showed that HMs severely affect soil microbial communities by reducing their diversity (Chodak et al. 2013; Zampieri et al. 2016), richness (Cui et al. 2018), microbial biomass, metabolic activity (Chen et al. 2014; Hong et al. 2015; Zampieri et al. 2016; Fajardo et al. 2019) and by altering their structure (Cui et al. 2018; Feng et al. 2018; Zhang et al. 2018). Recently, many studies were focused on the ecological effects of HMs on microbial community structure and diversity using next-generation DNA sequencing technologies (NGS) (Gołębiewski et al. 2014; Fajardo et al. 2019; Jiang et al. 2019; Xiao et al. 2019; Zhao et al. 2019; Huang et al. 2021). Gołębiewski et al. (2014) found that the diversity and abundance of soil microorganisms near a Pb-Zn mining area have been reduced and that Zn was the largest selective factor. Zhao et al. (2019) reported that HMs (Cu, Zn, Pb) affected the abundance and structural diversity of microbial communities in the mining area. Fajardo et al. (2019) showed significant phylogenetic and functional shifts in the bacterial community during the soil exposure to Pb, Cd, and Zn. Xiao et al. (2019) revealed that the bacterial community structure was mainly altered by soil organic matter, HMs (Cr) and pH. According to Huang et al. (2021), pH and HMs (Cr, Cu, Ni, and Zn) were among the most powerful factors, which change the community structure in HM contaminated soil under remediation.

Many studies reported that soil physicochemical properties (soil pH, soil texture, organic matter, etc.) moderate HMs’ toxicity and therefore, HMs play a key role in shaping the community diversity and structure (Wang et al. 2022).

Taking into consideration that soil is highly heterogeneous, it is necessary to investigate the microbial communities at different sites and scales (Wang et al. 2022). In this term, the aim of this study was to assess the correlation between soil bacterial abundance and soil physicochemical properties, including HM content along the Zn, Pb and Cd contamination gradient in the area of non-ferrous processing plant KCM-2000. KCM-2000 is the largest lead-zinc smelter in the country, located in the vicinity of Plovdiv city, Southern Bulgaria. We hypothesized that long-term HM contamination reduced the abundance and changed the composition of indigenous soil bacterial communities, and these effects might be modulated by the local soil properties.

Materials and methods

Study area and soil sampling

The study area is located in the region of a non-ferrous metal plant KCM 2000- Plovdiv, Southern Bulgaria (42°03'40.8"N, 24°48'52.0"E) (Fig. 1). Topsoil samples (0–20 cm) were collected in June 2020 along a gradient of contamination with Zn, Pb and Cd. Five points have been selected from a monitoring map, considering the direction of spread of the diffuse pollution as follows: KCM_1, named ”Green belt of decorative trees”, (42°03'31.68"N, 24°49'19.2"E), located at a distance of 0.5 km – south of the smelter; KCM_2 (42°03'5.76"N, 24°49'19.6"E) – 2 km south of the smelter; KCM_3 (42°02'6"N, 24°49'19.2"E) located close to the village of Dolni Voden – 3 km south of the smelter; KCM_4 (42°03'31.68"N, 24°49'45.12"E) – 1 km south-east of the smelter; and KCM_5 (42°04'23.52"N, 24°49'45.12"E) – 1 km east of the smelter. Five subsamples per site were pooled and used for further analyses. At all sites, the soil was classified as alluvial, being crop managed, except at KCM_1, where it was classified as technogenic.

Figure 1.

Map of the study area in Southern Bulgaria and sampling sites.

Soil physicochemical properties and heavy metal content

Soil pH was measured in 0.1M CaCl2 according to ISO 10390:2005. Soil texture was determined by the Kachinsky method (1958). The total organic carbon (TOC) was determined according to Chen et al. (2014). Soil nitrate (NO3-N) and ammonium (NH4-N) nitrogen and inorganic phosphates (P2O5) were determined according to the methods of Keeney and Nelson (1982), and Olsen (1982), respectively. Soil moisture (SM) was calculated after oven drying (105 °C). The concentration of heavy metals was measured by ELAN 5000 Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometer (Perkin-Elmer, Shelton, CT, USA) according to ISO 11047:1998 after soil decomposition by aqua regia (total HMs) and soil extraction with 0.01M CaCl2 (bioavailable forms of HMs). Nemerow’s pollution index (NPI) was calculated to evaluate the overall pollution of heavy metals in the soil samples (Zhao et al. 2019).

Enumeration of heterotrophic bacteria

The bacterial abundance was estimated by the use of colony-forming units (CFUs) in serial dilution in R2A medium at 25 °C for 2 days. The selected dilution from each test sample was 10-4 and it was plated in triplicate. For this analysis, we used 10–100 colonies per plate.

DNA extraction

The genomic DNA was extracted from 0.5 g soil using the E.Z.N.A DNA soil kit (Omega Bio-tek, USA) using the manufacturer’s recommended protocol. The soil DNA quality was controlled by a spectrophotometer (NanoDrop 1000, ThermoScientific, USA) and agarose gel electrophoresis.

Quantitative PCR (qPCR) of the 16S rRNA gene

Bacterial abundance was quantified by real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) with bacterial universal primer pairs Eub338f (5’-ATTACCGCGGCTGCTGG-3’)/Eub518r (5’-ATTACCGCGGCTGCTGG-3’) for 16S rRNA gene (Fierer et al. 2005). The qPCR reactions were set up using iTaqTM Universal SYBRGreen Supermix (BioRad) as described in Aleksova et al. (2020) and PCR efficiency was 90% (R2 =0.9879).

Statistical analyses

Soil properties and HM concentrations were compared using principal component analysis (PCA). Prior to the analysis the data was normalized and checked for outliers. Linear correlations between the resulting indicator of pollution and the copies of 16S rRNA gene found in each sample were plotted and evaluated (r2 metric of plotted trendline). Additionally, the significance of the correlation between the two variables was evaluated with the Student T-test.

The PCA statistical analyses were carried out using Primer 7.0. Univariable statistical correlations were tested using STATGRAPHICS Centrion XVII software package. (Karamfilov et al. 2019).

Results

Environmental variables

The values of studied soil properties are shown in Table 1. The soils were determined as sandy loam textured. The soil pH was neutral (pH 6.7 to 7.2) and the total organic matter content (TOC) ranged from 6.45 g kg-1 to 14.07 g kg-1. Soils were abundant with inorganic nitrate (especially KCM_1 and KCM_2) and inorganic phosphates. Probably, the high NO3-N concentration in KCM_1 and KCM_2 was due to soil fertilization.

Table 1.
Download as
CSV
XLSX

Soil physicochemical properties and concentrations of heavy metals (total and bioavailable forms) in the area of KMC-2000.

Soil parameter Soils
KCM_1 KCM_2 KCM_3 KCM_4 KCM_5
pH 7 7.1 7.2 6.7 6.8
Sand (%) 17.6 53.6 47.1 49.0 51.7
Silt (%) 39.2 30.9 31 30.8 36.2
Clay (%) 43.3 15.5 21.9 20.2 12.1
Soil moisture (SM) (%) 16.7 12.3 9.3 14.7 22.7
TOC (g kg-1) 9.65 14.07 6.45 12.33 7.035
NO3-N (mg g-1) 43.38 16.32 3.01 5.13 †ND
NH4-N (mg g-1) 6.62 5.13 3.26 2.25 2.22
P2O5 (mg kg-1) 5.69 24.02 7.42 6.89 †ND
Zn (mg kg-1) 9452 1558.2 216.2 6872 740
Pb (mg kg-1) 11569 1370.1 135.6 5723 335
Cd (mg kg-1) 184.9 15.7 3.9 86.2 9.3
Znb‡ (mg kg-1) 8.2 0.1 0.1 3.3 0.3
Pbb‡ (mg kg-1) 2.6 0.2 0.9 0.2 0.8
Cdb‡ (mg kg-1) 9 0.2 0.5 1.1 0.4
NPI§ 73.27 8.74 1.00 37.46 3.11

†ND – No data; ‡b – Bioavailable forms of the heavy metals; §NPI – Nemerow Pollution Index.

The HM concentrations at KCM_3 were under (Zn) and slightly higher (Pb and Cd) than the maximum permissible concentration (MPC) allowed under Bulgarian Regulation 3/2008 (http://eea.governement.bg/bg/legislation/soil), and this sample was considered as a control in our study. Pb was the most serious soil pollutant, and its concentration was over 100 (KCM_1), 57 (KCM_4), 13.7 (KCM_2) and 3 (KCM_5) times higher than the guideline limit. Cd was the other most serious soil pollutant and its concentrations exceeded the MPC in the following order: KCM_1 (92.45 times) >KCM_4 (43 times) >KCM_2 (7.85 times) >KCM_5 (4.0 times). The order of Zn soil contamination comparing to MPC was: KCM_1 (29.5 times) >KCM_4 (21.0 times) >KCM_2 (4.8 times) >KCM_5 (2.0 times). Nemerow’s Pollution index (NPI) assessed the overall level of soil contamination (Zhao et al. 2019), and the soils were classified as heavily contaminated (NPI>3), except KCM_3, which had precautionary values of contamination (Table 1).

Soil bacterial abundance

The results from the bacterial abundance of heavily contaminated soils were compared as a percent to KCM_3, which was a control soil in the experiment (Fig. 2). The highest number of cultivable heterotrophic bacteria (CFU) and 16S rRNA gene copies were reported for KCM_2. This was the only site, where bacterial abundance was around 27% (CFU) and 55% (16S rRNA) higher than that of the control (KCM_3). The lowest bacterial abundance was detected in the most contaminated site KCM_1, where it decreased by 56% (CFU) and 87% (16S rRNA gene copies) compared to the control soil. The soil bacterial abundance in KCM_4 and KCM_5 decreased by 47% (CFU) and 64% (16S rRNA) for KCM_4, and by 45% (CFU) and 17% (16S rRNA) for KCM_5 compared to KCM_3.

Figure 2.

Soil bacterial abundance (% of KCM_3) of cultivable heterotrophic bacteria (CFU) and 16S rRNA gene copies.

Correlation between soil properties and heavy metals

Soil properties (total organic content, inorganic ions, soil particles of silt, clay and sand) and HM concentrations in soils were compared using principal components analysis (PCA) and the results are presented in Fig. 3. PC1 explained 65.7% of the total soil variation and showed a significant negative correlation with HM concentrations (total and bioavailable forms), concentrations of nitrate, nitrogen, soil pH and silt particles (Table 2). PC2 explained 17.7% of the total soil variation and positively correlated with sand particles and negatively with TOC and phosphates. PCA ordination showed a clear gradient of contamination level and differences in soil characteristics between different sampling sites (Fig. 3, Tables 2, 3). Thus, the resulting PC1 score for each sampling site can be regarded as an integral index of heavy metals pollution throughout the study area. Based on this evaluation, the soils of KCM_3 (PC1=1.6) and KCM_2 (PC1=1.57) were qualified as the least impacted by HMs, followed by KCM_5 (PC1=1.7), and the highly impacted soils of KCM_4 (PC1=0.486) and KCM_1 (PC1=-5.35) (Table 3).

Table 2.
Download as
CSV
XLSX

PCA axes scores of measured soil variables.

Variable PC1 PC2 PC3 PC4
Variation explained (%) 65.7 17.7 13.4 3.2
pH -0.001 -0.308 -0.618 -0.327
TOC -0.011 -0.501 0.437 0.205
Sand 0.324 -0.047 0.119 0.110
Silt -0.248 0.266 -0.137 0.708
Clay -0.316 -0.027 -0.102 -0.358
Zn -0.284 -0.019 0.357 -0.211
Pb -0.313 -0.028 0.219 0.127
Cd -0.316 0.000 0.197 -0.117
Znb -0.321 0.032 0.156 -0.119
Pbb -0.296 0.142 -0.276 0.067
Cdb -0.328 0.019 -0.057 0.037
NO3-N -0.305 -0.216 -0.080 0.199
NH4-N -0.244 -0.357 -0.240 0.251
P2O5 0.068 -0.620 -0.022 0.116
Figure 3.

Principal component analysis of soil properties and heavy metals in the area of KCM-2000. Principal components axis 1 (PC1) explains 65.7% of the total soil variation and PC2 – 17.5%.

Correlation between bacterial abundance and soil properties

The soils had a high abundance of bacteria, whose number varied from 17.80×1010 (KCM_2) to 1.49×1010 (KCM_1) 16S rRNA gene copies (Table 3). To evaluate the impact of HM contamination on soil bacterial abundance, estimated as 16S rRNA gene copies, an exponential correlation was performed. The good exponential correlation between the values of PC1 pollution score, obtained by the PCA (Table 3), and 16S rRNA gene copies (R2=0.8251) was demonstrated in Fig. 4. The results indicated both a dramatic decrease of soil bacterial abundance at KCM_1 and its exponential increase in soils along the gradient of contamination with Zn, Pb and Cd. The same analysis was conducted with the abundance of soil heterotrophic bacteria. The influence of increasing heavy metal contamination on microbial abundance was also confirmed by the significant correlation between the 16S rRNA gene copies and the PC1 pollution score (Student T-test, p=0.017).

Table 3.
Download as
CSV
XLSX

PC1 score and 16s rRNA gene copies.

Sample PC1 score 16S rRNA gene copies ×1010
KCM_1 -5.35 1.49
KCM_2 1.57 17.80
KCM_3 1.6 11.50
KCM_4 0.486 4.17
KCM_5 1.7 9.57
Figure 4.

Exponential correlation between integrated HM contamination status (PC1 score) and bacterial abundance (16S rRNA gene copies) in the studied soils (R2=0.8251) from the area of KCM – 2000.

Discussion

The present study focused on the correlation between bacterial abundance and soil properties in long-term contaminated soils in the area of non-ferrous metal processing plant KCM-2000. The gradient of Zn, Pb, and Cd concentrations in the soil from KCM_3 to KCM_1 provided a good soil pattern for estimating the changes that occurred in soil bacterial abundance under the power of long-term HM contamination. The soil of KCM_3 was determined in this study as a control (NPI=1.00). In KCM_3, the concentration of Pb was slightly higher than the MPC, and Pb bioavailable forms were equal to that of KCM_5, exceeded by 2.5 times that of KCM_2 and KCM_4, and was by 3.0 times lower than Pbb of KCM_1.

The distribution of bacterial abundance of unculturable and cultivable bacteria along a gradient of contamination was estimated through quantitative PCR of 16S rRNA gene and numbers of colony-forming units (CFU). In general, the soils of the site of interest showed a high bacterial abundance – 1.49×1010-17.80×1010 16S rRNA gene copies (total bacterial abundance) and 1.30×106 -3.70×106 CFU (abundance of heterotrophic bacteria).

Although, the HM gradient of soil contamination determined a gradient of soil bacterial distribution, only in the case of KCM_2 bacterial abundance was higher (around 55% for 16S rRNA and 27% for CFU) compared to that of the control. We suggested that this inconsistency with the model of general bacterial distribution could be due to the toxicity of the much higher Pbb concentrations in KCM_3, or attributed to the modulating effects of higher concentrations of TOC, NO3-N and P2O5 in KCM_2 compared to KCM_3 soil. Bacterial reduction in HM contaminated soils varied between 45–56% (CFU) and 54–87% (16S rRNA), except for the relatively low decrease in 16S rRNA gene copies in KCM_5 (17% compared to KCM_3). This fact could be explained by the relatively low level of soil contamination compared to the other studied sites (NPI=3.11). The obtained results were consistent with our previous study, where bacterial abundance (CFU and 16S rRNA gene copies) decreased in long-term contaminated with Cu, Zn and Pb soils in the area of copper mine and smelter (Aleksova et al. 2020; Palov et al. 2020). Similar findings for the decrease of CFU (Pacwa-Płociniczak et al. 2018) and 16S rRNA gene copies (Yin et al. 2015) under a long-term HM pollution in soils were observed by other authors. Fajardo et al. (2019) explained the decrease in bacterial abundance under HMs by a decrease in the metabolic activity of Bacteria in microbial soil communities. Other authors showed the opposite trend, which manifested that HMs (Cu, Zn, Pb and Cd) affected slightly the abundance, but strongly the diversity of bacterial communities (Tipayno et al. 2018; Huang et al. 2021).

To elucidate the effects of HMs and soil properties on the distribution of bacteria, an exponential correlation between the values of PC1 scores, and both 16S rRNA gene copies and CFU was conducted. There was found to be a good correlation between soil variables and 16S rRNA gene copies, but a low relationship between soil characteristics and CFU. We assumed that the lack of significant correlation between soil variables and heterotrophic bacteria (CFU) might have resulted from the limitation of cultivation technique or the high ecological tolerance of cultivable representatives of bacterial communities. Some authors (De Leij et al. 1994) suggested that cultivable bacteria could be classified as r-strategic opportunists, which grow fast, tolerate environmental fluctuations and are highly resistant to outside impacts.

Conclusions

The total bacterial abundance (estimated by the quantified 16S rRNA genes) increased exponentially in contrast to the abundance of heterotrophic bacteria, which could be explained by the limitations of the cultivable method. Regarding the statistical analysis, the bacterial abundance, expressed by the 16S rRNA gene copies, was considered as a more valuable indicator of the HM contamination effects on the soil inhabitants in comparison to the heterotrophic bacterial abundance. The reduction of bacterial abundance in heavily contaminated soil indicated that the soil properties (soil pH, total organic carbon, inorganic ions, soil texture) could modify the effects of heavy metals and the response of microorganisms to that stress in long-term contaminated soils. Further studies are needed for investigating the shifts in bacterial community structure in this area in response to the HM contamination gradient.

Acknowledgements

This study was financially supported by the National Research Fund of the Bulgarian Ministry of Education and Science (Grant-DN11/4-Dec.2017).

References

  • Aleksova M, Palov D, Dinev N, Boteva S, Kenarova A, Dimitrov R, Radeva G (2020) Bacterial abundance along a gradient of heavy metal contaminated soils in the region of Zlatitsa-Pirdop valley, Western Bulgaria. Comptes rendus de l’Academie bulgare des Sciences 73(3): 433–442.
  • Ali MM, Hossain Al-Imran D, Khan MdS, Begum M, Osman MH (2021) Environmental Pollution with Heavy Metals: A Public Health Concern. Heavy Metals – Their Environmental Impacts and Mitigation. IntechOpen Book Series. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.96805
  • Chen Z, He F, Zhang X, Sun X, Zheng J, Zheng J (2014) Heavy metal pollution decreases microbial abundance, diversity and activity within particle-size fractions of a paddy soil. FEMS Microbiology Ecology 87(1): 164–181. https://doi.org/10.1111/1574-6941.12212
  • Chodak M, Gołębiewski M, Morawska-Płoskonka J, Kuduk K, Niklińska M (2013) Diversity of microorganisms from forest soils differently polluted with heavy metals. Applied Soil Ecology 64: 7–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2012.11.004
  • Cui H, Liu LL, Dai JR, Yu XN, Guo X, Yi SJ, Zhou DY, Guo WH, Du N (2018) Bacterial community shaped by heavy metals and contributing to health risks in cornfields. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 166: 259–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.09.096
  • De Leij FAAM, Whipps JM, Lynch JM (1994) The use of colony development for the characterization of bacterial communities in soil and on roots. Microbial Ecology 27(1): 81–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00170116
  • Fajardo C, Costa G, Nande M, Botías P, García-Cantalejo J, Martín M (2019) Pb, Cd, and Zn soil contamination: Monitoring functional and structural impacts on the microbiome. Applied Soil Ecology 135: 56–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2018.10.022
  • Feng M, Adams JM, Fan KK, Shi Y, Sun R, Chu H (2018) Long-term fertilization influences community assembly processes of soil diazotrophs. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 126: 151–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2018.08.021
  • Fierer N, Jackson JA, Vilgalys R, Jackson RB (2005) Assessment of Soil Microbial Community Structure by Use of Taxon-Specific Quantitative PCR Assays. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 71(7): 4117–4120. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.71.7.4117-4120.2005
  • Gołębiewski M, Deja-Sikora E, Cichosz M, Tretyn A, Wróbel B (2014) 16SrDNA Pyrosequencing Analysis of Bacterial Community in Heavy Metals Polluted Soils. Microbial Ecology 67: 635–647. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-013-0344-7
  • Hong C, Si Y, Xing Y, Yang L (2015) Illumina MiSeq sequencing investigation on the contrasting soil bacterial community structures in different iron mining areas. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International 22(14): 10788–10799. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-4186-3
  • Huang C-C, Liang C-M, Yang T-I, Chen J-L, Wang W-K (2021) Shift of bacterial communities in heavy metal-contaminated agricultural land during a remediation process. PLoS ONE 16(7): e0255137. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0255137
  • ISO 11047 (1998) Soil quality – Determination of cadmium, chromium, cobalt, copper, lead, manganese, nickel and zinc – Flame and electrothermal atomic absorption spectrometric methods. https://www.iso.org/standard/24010.html
  • Jiang B, Adebayo A, Jia J, Xing Y, Deng S, Guo L, Liang Y, Zhang D (2019) Impacts of heavy metals and soil properties at a Nigerian e-waste site on soil microbial community. Journal of Hazardous Materials 15: 187–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.08.060
  • Kachinsky A (1958) Mechanical and micro-aggregates composition of soil, methods for its determination Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow.
  • Karamfilov V, Berov D, Panayotidis P (2019) Using Zostera noltei biometrics for evaluation of the ecological and environmental quality status of Black Sea coastal waters. Regional Studies in Marine Science 27: e100524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsma.2019.100524
  • Keeney DR, Nelson DW (1982) Nitrogen – inorganic forms. In: Page AL (Ed.) Methods of Soil Analysis: Part 2 Chemical and Microbiological Properties. American Society of Agronomy, Soil Science Society of America, Madison, 643–698. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronmonogr9.2.2ed.c33
  • Martínez-Toledo Á, González-Mille DJ, García-Arreola ME, Cruz-Santiago O, Trejo-Acevedo A, Ilizaliturri-Hernández CA (2021) Patterns in utilization of carbon sources in soil microbial communities contaminated with mine solid wastes from San Luis Potosi, Mexico. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 208: e111493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.111493
  • Olsen SR (1982) Phosphorus. In: Page AL (Ed.) Methods of Soil Analysis: Part 2 Chemical and Microbiological Properties. American Society of Agronomy, Soil Science Society of America, Madison, 403–430. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronmonogr9.2.2ed.c24
  • Pacwa-Płociniczak M, Płociniczak T, Yu D, Kurola JM, Sinkkonen A, Piotrowska-Seget Z, Romantschuk M (2018) Effect of Silene vulgaris and Heavy Metal Pollution on Soil Microbial Diversity in Long-Term Contaminated Soil. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution 229(1): e13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-017-3655-3
  • Palov DD, Aleksova MR, Nikolova RN, Dinev NS, Kenarova AE, Boteva SB, Radeva GS (2020) Relationships between Soil Microbial Activity, Bacterial Diversity and Abiotic Factors Along the Heavy Metal Contamination Gradient. Ecologia Balkanica 3: 31–39.
  • Tipayno SC, Truu J, Samaddar S, Truu M, Preem JK, Oopkaup K, Espenberg M, Chatterjee P, Kang Y, Kim K, Sa T (2018) The bacterial community structure and functional profile in the heavy metal contaminated paddy soils, surrounding a nonferrous smelter in South Korea. Ecology and Evolution 8(12): 6157–6168. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4170
  • Wuana RA, Okieimen FE (2011) Heavy Metals in Contaminated Soils: A Review of Sources, Chemistry, Risks and Best Available Strategies for Remediation. ISRN Ecology 402647: 1–20. https://doi.org/10.5402/2011/402647
  • Xiao S, Zhang Q, Chen X, Dong F, Chen H, Liu M, Ali I (2019) Speciation Distribution of Heavy Metals in Uranium Mining Impacted Soils and Impact on Bacterial Community Revealed by High-Throughput Sequencing. Frontiers in Microbiology 10: e1867. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.01867
  • Yin H, Niu J, Ren Y, Cong J, Zhang X, Fan F, Xiao Y, Zhang X, Deng J, Xie M, He Z, Zhou J, Liang Y, Liu X (2015) An integrated insight into the response of sedimentary microbial communities to heavy metal contamination. Scientific Reports 5(1): e14266. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep14266
  • Zampieri BDB, Pinto AB, Schultz L, de Oliveira MA, de Oliveira AJ (2016) Diversity and Distribution of Heavy Metal-Resistant Bacteria in Polluted Sediments of the Araça Bay, São Sebastião (SP), and the Relationship Between Heavy Metals and Organic Matter Concentrations. Microbial Ecology 72(3): 582–594. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-016-0821-x
  • Zhang X, Johnston ER, Barberán A, Ren Y, Wang Z, Han X (2018) Effect of intermediate disturbance on soil microbial functional diversity depends on the amount of effective resources. Environmental Microbiology 20(10): 3862–3875. https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.14407
  • Zhao X, Huang J, Lu J, Sun Y (2019) Study on the influence of soil microbial community on the long-term heavy metal pollution of different land use types and depth layers in mine. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 170: 218–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.11.136
login to comment